Official League Data Mandates
Following the failure to secure direct "integrity fees" post-PASPA, major US sports leagues (NBA, MLB, NFL) successfully lobbied state legislatures (e.g., TN, IL, MI) to mandate the use of **Official League Data** for settling in-play (Tier 2) wagers. These mandates circumvented the *Motorola v. NBA...
Summary
Following the failure to secure direct "integrity fees" post-PASPA, major US sports leagues (NBA, MLB, NFL) successfully lobbied state legislatures (e.g., TN, IL, MI) to mandate the use of **Official League Data** for settling in-play (Tier 2) wagers. These mandates circumvented the *Motorola v. NBA* precedent—which established sports scores as public facts—by creating statutory requirements for data usage under the guise of consumer protection. This structure entrenched a duopoly of data distributors, **Genius Sports** and **Sportradar**, who secured exclusive league rights and charged operators premium fees. The mandates transformed data from a commodity into a high-cost intellectual property asset, making the leagues direct beneficiaries of betting revenue through commercial data contracts.
References & Further Reading
- 1. Sportradar and Genius Sports Settle Litigation Over Data Rights View Source →
Related Topics
More in HistoryThe Group of Copenhagen
Explore the history and significance of The Group of Copenhagen in the context of sports betting.
The Invention of the Point Spread
The **Point Spread** was invented in the 1940s, primarily credited to Chicago mathematician and bookmaker **Charles K. McNeil**. Before this innovation, sports betting relied on fixed-odds moneylines, which stifled liquidity on lopsided matchups. McNeil's system replaced adjusting the *payout* with ...
The 'Official Data' Mandate and Antitrust Concerns
Explore the history and significance of The 'Official Data' Mandate and Antitrust Concerns in the context of sports betting.