Back to Topics
History

Daily Fantasy Sports (DFS) as a Regulatory Trojan Horse

Daily Fantasy Sports (DFS) served as a **Regulatory Trojan Horse**, allowing operators to penetrate the US market and acquire millions of customers prior to the legalization of sports betting. Leveraging a carve-out in the **2006 UIGEA** intended for season-long fantasy, companies like **DraftKings*...

Summary

Daily Fantasy Sports (DFS) served as a **Regulatory Trojan Horse**, allowing operators to penetrate the US market and acquire millions of customers prior to the legalization of sports betting. Leveraging a carve-out in the **2006 UIGEA** intended for season-long fantasy, companies like **DraftKings** and **FanDuel** created a high-velocity wagering product that mimicked sports betting mechanics. When the 2015 "insider trading" scandal forced states to regulate DFS, it inadvertently created the legislative and technological infrastructure (geolocation, taxation, KYC) for mobile wagering. Upon the repeal of **PASPA in 2018**, these operators pivoted instantly, converting their "fantasy" databases into sportsbook customers and securing a dominant duopoly over traditional casino operators who lacked the digital footprint and user base.

Introduction to Daily Fantasy Sports as a Regulatory Trojan Horse

The emergence of Daily Fantasy Sports (DFS) has been a pivotal factor in shaping the current sports betting landscape in the US. By strategically leveraging regulatory carve-outs and developing necessary infrastructure, DFS operators have successfully created a foothold in the market, ultimately paving the way for the legalization of sports betting. This phenomenon can be aptly described as a Regulatory Trojan Horse, where DFS operators infiltrated the market by exploiting loopholes in existing legislation.

The 2006 UIGEA Carve-out: A Catalyst for DFS Growth

The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) of 2006 inadvertently created a carve-out for season-long fantasy sports, which DFS operators such as DraftKings and FanDuel exploited to create high-velocity wagering products. These products closely resembled sports betting mechanics, attracting millions of customers and generating significant revenue. The UIGEA carve-out can be seen as a catalyst for the growth of the DFS industry, which ultimately laid the groundwork for the current sports betting landscape.

The 2015 Insider Trading Scandal: A Regulatory Wake-up Call

The 2015 "insider trading" scandal involving DFS operators prompted states to regulate the industry, inadvertently creating the necessary legislative and technological infrastructure for mobile wagering. This included the development of geolocation, taxation, and Know Your Customer (KYC) protocols, which would later become essential for the sports betting industry. The regulatory response to the scandal can be seen as a wake-up call, highlighting the need for stricter regulations and oversight in the DFS industry.

The Repeal of PASPA: A Turning Point for Sports Betting

The repeal of the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA) in 2018 marked a significant turning point for the sports betting industry. DFS operators, having already established a strong presence in the market, were well-positioned to pivot into the sports betting market. By converting their existing "fantasy" databases into sportsbook customers, DraftKings and FanDuel secured a dominant duopoly over traditional casino operators, who lacked the digital footprint and user base to compete effectively.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the emergence of Daily Fantasy Sports has served as a Regulatory Trojan Horse, facilitating the entry of operators into the US market and laying the groundwork for the current sports betting landscape. The strategic leveraging of regulatory carve-outs, coupled with the development of necessary infrastructure, has enabled DFS operators to maintain a significant advantage in the market. As the sports betting industry continues to evolve, it is essential to recognize the role of DFS in shaping the current landscape and to consider the implications of this phenomenon for future regulatory decisions.

References & Further Reading

  • 1.
    31 U.S. Code § 5362 - Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act Definitions View Source →
  • 2.
    Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (2018) View Source →